1. Senate bill numbers 2249 and 2250

http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText14/SenateText14/S2249.pdf (Link to first bill)

http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText14/SenateText14/S2250.pdf (Link to second bill)

Both bills are relating to LABOR - MINIMUM WAGES

The first bill was introduced by Senators Lynch, Miller, Metts, Pearson and Satchell

The first piece of legislation would provide an increase in the minimum wage to $9.00 per hour on January 1, 2015 and would continue raising the minimum wage each January 1^st until January 1, 2017, at

 which time the minimum wage would be increased automatically each year using an index.

The Chamber Coalition opposes this legislation. (The minimum wage was increased to $8.00 per hour just a little over two months ago.) In particular, the Chamber Coalition is very concerned about automatically increasing the minimum wage by tying it to an index.

The second bill was introduced by Senators Raptakis, Ciccone, Sheehan, Walaska and McCaffrey

Although similar to the first bill, this bill would require an increase in the minimum wage each January 1^st to be calculated by using an index. The Chamber Coalition also opposes this legislation.
Both bills were heard by the Senate Labor Committee and have been held for further study.

2. Senate bill number 2232

http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText14/SenateText14/S2232.pdf (Link to bill)

This bill is related to COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE--PROCEDURE GENERALLY--JUDGMENTS, ORDERS AND DECREES -- INTEREST ON JUDGMENTS

The bill was introduced by Senator Miller

The bill would provide that interest on judgments would accrue from the date of the filing of the civil action, not the date the cause of action occurred.

The Chamber Coalition supports this responsible tort reform legislation. Many lawsuits have lingered for a great deal of time during the judicial process, thereby subjecting civil defendants (often business entities) to extra interest that can be very expensive.

3. House bill number 7478

http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText14/HouseText14/H7478.pdf (Link to bill)

This bill is related to DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES

The bill was introduced by Representatives Lima, O`Neill, and Jacquard

This legislation would repeal current law and allow class action lawsuits to be brought against ANY businesses that are regulated in any way by the state.

The Chamber Coalition opposes this legislation. Current state law prohibits bringing class action suits against regulated entities. This bill is “an old favorite” of trial lawyers and will lead to expensive, unnecessary and very burdensome legal liability for a great number of businesses. (Financial institutions, insurance companies, gaming venues, pharmacies, public utilities, communications providers, health care facilities and many, many more.)

__________________________________________________________________________________

Two identical Senate and House bills (see below links) have been submitted that would grant jurisdiction to the workers' compensation court to decide whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor in a number of various labor contexts.

http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText14/SenateText14/S2409.pdf

http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText14/HouseText14/H7277.pdf

These bills have not been heard by a legislative committee yet, but because they have been filed the Chamber Coalition would like to provide our summary about independent contractor classification vs. employee classification:

From the Chamber Coalition’s point of view, the major issue with [employee misclassification] legislation is that it creates a presumption that everybody is an employee and sets a new standard to determine whether they are actually an independent contractor. Why do we need a new standard? Particularly one that in the Chamber Coalition’s  view makes it more difficult for the business community to contract with independent contractors and makes it more difficult for independent contractors themselves. We don’t need another impediment here in RI for business. A stringent “employee misclassification” law was enacted in Massachusetts a few years ago and has all but eliminated the use of independent contractors by business. It’s also drastically reduced some independent contractors’ business. The Chamber Coalition  recognizes that abuse could be a problem in certain circumstances, (flagrant violators not

paying withholding taxes, unemployment, workers compensation, etc.) however, the Chamber Coalition doesn’t believe the proposed legislation is the answer. The Chamber believes that stricter civil and criminal enforcement and other avenues are more appropriate. For example, why not strengthen the civil penalties? Perhaps even criminalize certain flagrant violations? (Huge difference between flagrant behavior and honest oversight.)

If proposed legislation concerning employee definitions pass as written, everyone from our state’s largest employers (who might use independent contractors for anything from removal of snow to the installation of phone lines) to the state’s many sole proprietorships, will have one more impediment to engaging in business. We don’t want what happened in Massachusetts to happen in Rhode Island. Massachusetts enacted an independent contractor law that creates the presumption of employee status (vs. independent contractor) for wage law, and requires businesses to meet a three part test to prove otherwise. As referenced in one report, “the Massachusetts law makes the test essentially impossible to meet for a company with workers providing services that are within the company’s usual course of business. The law also broadens the applicability, increases its penalties for noncompliance, and makes it a more attractive vehicle for private lawsuits, including class actions.” There has to be a better alternative. In the Chamber Coalition’s opinion, we don’t need the force of law to help “level the playing field” for certain (largely labor shops) businesses who may feel they have lost out on an opportunity to earn additional business.
___________________________________________________________________________________

Where will your Chamber Coalition be at the State House this week? (Schedule to date)